kellianne: (Default)
[personal profile] kellianne
Lindsay as Marilyn? Sorry, Lindsey, but it just doesn't work. Marylin looks better than you even when she's 36ish and about to die. Maybe what you really need is time away from the tanning booth? And, man. I won't even get into the flat hair. I'm really surprised the photo team let these out of the box like this.

(i usually like lindsay shoots, btw. that W spread a few years back was outstanding. i'm not saying this because i don't think she's got allure. this set is just so bad.)

Date: 2008-02-18 10:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octavekitten.livejournal.com
wow. GROSS!

why would they pick her to do that? she looks NOTHING like her. They should have at least gone with scarlett johansen or something...

Date: 2008-02-18 10:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kellianne.livejournal.com
the one with her on her back is especially disturbing. they didn't even bother to properly fix the fact that you can see her wig lace and cap!!!

people should not try to do marylin, period. they will never look good in comparison.

Date: 2008-02-19 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] razorart.livejournal.com
I absolutely agree with that statement.

I want to hurl looking at these pictures.

Date: 2008-02-18 10:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anabug.livejournal.com
As a large breasted girl (34DD of doom) it's really nice to see natural large breasts, no implants, no lifts, nothing. Her boobs look great. Her face, her hair... whatever. I was looking at her boobs.

Date: 2008-02-18 10:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kellianne.livejournal.com
they are lovely, it's true!

Date: 2008-02-19 03:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deadpanwalking.livejournal.com
While I certainly agree with you, my spies (who are legion) tell me those aren't entirely natural.

Date: 2008-02-19 04:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anabug.livejournal.com
There's no way! They look completely real - floppy, uneven. You can do a lot with teardrop implants these days but her boobs look like mine.

Date: 2008-02-18 10:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] billyfleetwood.livejournal.com
ummm, yeah....but as Lindsay's first public nekkid pics, I gotta say it's a good move. I'm guessing some less classy nekkid photos got taken, probably on a coke binge in some hotel somewhere, and rather than take the bad publicity, they jump the gun with official nekkid pics. Redoing a Marilyn shoot is a good cover story cause it's about the homage, and not just getting her tits out in Playboy. And it probably is a good ploy for getting more grown up movie roles.

Date: 2008-02-18 10:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alicetiara.livejournal.com
Very savvy, Mister Mason. In total accordance. On the press blurb about the shoot, she says it was a no-brainer to do b/c she loves Marilyn and the original photographer was doing the same shoots. True dat and all, but I agree with KA that they should have styled it better and done better hair, definitely.

I also like Lindsay a lot and think she's hot so naked pictures of her are always welcome in my book!

Date: 2008-02-18 10:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kellianne.livejournal.com
she's hot but she's no good as marilyn. lindsay as lindsay would have been just fine, even in playboy. it didn't hurt drew's career one bit, and she was about the same age.

Date: 2008-02-18 11:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kellianne.livejournal.com
ahh now there's an idea! i think that she SHOULD have just gone for playboy, though. playboy is a totally acceptable place for young actresses to show the goods. monroe started that game and i'm all for keeping it on.

Date: 2008-02-18 10:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gobetween.livejournal.com
I like the freckles. That's it.

Date: 2008-02-18 10:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bostonista.livejournal.com
I think as a failure, though, it's interesting. I actually liked the photos, because the parallel between Lohan and Monroe is so poorly drawn, and instead what I see is a young woman trying to inhabit some legend, any legend, and failing ... it's kind of powerful.

Also, Lindsay has the least sexy big-boobed body I've seen in ages. I think it's the narrow hips. She really doesn't know how to pose nude ... she could've thrown her hips to the side and faked a la Bundchen.

Date: 2008-02-18 10:47 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-02-18 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kellianne.livejournal.com
that's actually a really interesting perspective. word.

Date: 2008-02-18 10:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skamille.livejournal.com
Yeah, I gotta agree. How can someone so naturally hot look so bad in these photos?

Date: 2008-02-18 10:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kellianne.livejournal.com
that's just it! i blame the photo team. i can see her wig lace and that's just silly.

Date: 2008-02-18 11:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sylviebosch.livejournal.com
full on gross. and the saddest thing is that the same photographer took both because the ones of marilyn were inspired and lovely and the ones of lindsay are eh, bad reproductions of the originals. maybe if another photographer (younger, dude was born in 1929) tried to pull off this editorial it may have worked better.

i think she looks desperate and uncomfortable--although it is nice to see that she is back to her normal size--even if she seems unsure what to do wit her body.

Date: 2008-02-19 12:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oola.livejournal.com
the people who worked on this should be fired. it's a messssss. awkward. totally + completely completely ill-conceived, all the way around.

i agree with the above comment that she looks "desperate and uncomfortable". i *hope* this is just yet another sign that this whole celebrity nonsense era is self-destructing/coming to an end/whatever.

nevertheless, her boobs are nice.

it's very telling that all these young celebrities/actresses are constantly done up as some icon or another for so many photoshoots - there is really very little to them in the end. (plus these so called creative teams working at so many mags and such are just lame)

i actually don't mind LL - but remember when they put her on Interview as Liz? HAAAAAA, R I D I C U L O U S.



Date: 2008-02-19 06:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kellianne.livejournal.com
I have to say that i thought the Lindsay as Liz shoot was really well done. The styling was good, the hair and makeup were good. AND LL looked hot. I usually like Interview spreads, though. They have this sexy all american look when they show off women, and being sexy all american, I think it's hot.

After working on several photo shoots when I did editorial stints in NYC, I'm just surprised that, with the whole team that works on photo jobs, this even happened. It's true that it DOES ring of amateur kitsch porn. But it doesn't look intentional, and it's not unintentional in a good way.

I do think it's interesting that the young girls are always dressed up as some old icon. Lindsay, in particular, seems desperate to want to be taken seriously as an ICON. I understand that she's really young and that all of us at some point in our past have gone great lengths to try too hard... but her people should have rallied around this one and made it way better.

Date: 2008-02-19 01:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ingopixel.livejournal.com
omg she looks OLD and HAGGARD. marilyn looked young and fresh and amazing.

also, aside from the major gazongas she has no kind of body.

awful makeup, hair, poses, angles, model... awful!

Date: 2008-02-19 03:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] billetdoux.livejournal.com
I am going on record as saying I love love love this photoshoot.

Date: 2008-02-19 04:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smapple.livejournal.com
Yeah I mean the styling is really bad, but I really love this shot:

http://media.nymag.com/fashion/08/lindsay-as-marilyn/index9.html

I think the whole shoot has a nice vintage amateur porn thing going on that would be pretty hot on it's own as long as it wasn't compared with MM.

Date: 2008-02-19 04:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kellianne.livejournal.com
You just love when girls are broke down!!

Date: 2008-02-19 07:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] welfaremom.livejournal.com
Yeah, I was just gonna comment, "Rick will be saving these forever and ever."

Date: 2008-02-19 09:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buckygirl23.livejournal.com
you know.. i like it and i think its interesting that Burt did both of them.. but honestly all homages are set up to fail. on a proud parent note i produced both the andre 3000 shoot and the shoot with the Fuerzabruta guys in the same issue. ! LOVE andre 3000.. they should have run 50 shots of him!

Date: 2008-02-20 01:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kellianne.livejournal.com
andre 3000 should have whole issues dedicated!! nice work!

cover culture

Date: 2008-02-20 07:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cd332.livejournal.com
I hate to say it, and you know this is one of my pet peeves: Instead of being absolutely fabulous in their own right, the stars of today are trying to be poor counterfeits of what was (and this may very well be just due to aging gay directors at fashion shoots attempting to resurrect their childhood icons). Lindsay as Liz, Marilyn...c'mon! I'm waiting for Lindsay as Oliver Reed (at least they have one thing in common in real life).

I'd welcome a cover feature of Lindsay as only Lindsay can unmistakably be: Loud, drunk, and makeup running all over.

But hey....if Jennifer Love Hewitt can be Audrey Hepburn, it's only a matter of time before Carrot-Top gets to play Joan Fontaine.

Profile

kellianne: (Default)
kellianne

October 2015

S M T W T F S
    123
4567 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 03:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios